Chicago: Neighborhoods Pt.II

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Wicker Park:

Wicker Park..the Silverlake and Williamsburg of Chicago. Chock full of bustling thoroughfares packed with endless trendy cafes, haute restaurants, fly boutiques, antique shops and other, specialty stores (stores selling notebooks, messenger bags, cult items, etc). I visited there a few times, mainly to just hang out, but also for breakfast and to photograph the area itself. One rainy morning, I followed the wise words of a bearded, bicycle-riding hipster and grabbed breakfast at the funky “Earwax” café. I got the highly-recommended challa bread French toast served with pastry cream…which made for a splendid breakfast, to say the very least. The place, with its “staff” (and our discussions about The Wire), wild décor and dive-ish vibe definitely reminded me of some my preferred haunts down here in LA. After that, in pouring rain, I walked along Milwaukee, admiring the handsome architectural offerings; it was primarily 2-4 story buildings done up in various Chicago-styles, often replete with corner turrets and other, prominent fixtures and details. There was lots of questionable infill, too, particularly in the form of 2-story “jumbo brick” buildings, which sported recessed roofs and decks. Not long after that, I wandered off the commercial corridor and into the residential part, something I’ve got to admit, was quite nice. Imagine block upon block of handsome brown and greystones, on wet, rain-soaked streets teeming with foliage in the various attractive hues, colors and tones of autumn. Such a setting, reminded me, at least to a certain degree of parts of (brownstone) Brooklyn, particularly Fort Greene.

And while this neighborhood definitely has an artsy vibe, you can tell that it it’s not nearly what it once used to be, perhaps the work of the gentrification handyman. Most of my friends told that the neighborhood is now thoroughly gentrified and much of the “scene” has migrated to places further west, such as the Ukrainian Village, Logan Square and Humboldt Park. Glad to see that the more things change, the more they stay the same; gentrification patterns across the US are pretty much the same.





Pilsen:

Pilsen. One of a handful of Chicago neighborhoods that I declared a “must-see,” I was drawn to Pilsen for its position as the revered heart of Chicago’s rapidly growing and now large Mexican community. Coming from Los Angeles, itself a city of Mexicans, seeing the Pilsen – and later comparing and contrasting it to similar Mexican neighborhoods here – was an obvious priority. Of course, hailing from the world’s 2nd-largest Mexican city, one second to only DF and larger than Monterrey or Guadalajara, it was a place that I could certainly relate to. Having grown used and accustomed to panaderías, carnicerías, taquerías and other neighborhood facets unique to Mexican culture, I felt right at home seeing such in the Pilsen.

The architecture was quite wonderful, too; A bevy of gorgeous Bavarian, Czech, and other Central and Eastern European styles, which were often characterized by large amounts of stonework. Somewhat unsurprising given that the neighborhood afterall was originally built and settled by immigrants from those countries. Today, legacies of their past remain, even if only in the form of old immigrant societies and organizations, along with their respective languages inscribed into the buildings, stating their purpose (or at least, former purposes). The neighborhood has obviously changed – most likely for the worst – something evidenced by the crumbling facades and the seemingly ubiquitous CPD (Chicago PD) CCTV installations that dot the urban landscape. Locals mentioned a gang problem, too, but aside from some graffiti here and there, I didn't notice too much really going on.

Following an extensive tour of the neighborhood, a friend and I debriefed in what really seemed to be the only welcoming store, a Church’s Chicken not too far from 18th St. I’ve got to admit, toying around, pointing at photos on thousands of dollars worth of camera equipment – almost naively, to a certain degree – inside a greasy chicken joint, and the reactions I received from the largely blue collar, working-class locals from doing so was definitely…memorable. After an hour had past, we set out to canvas the rest of 18th St, and then headed to the neighboring Little Village (nicknamed La Villita) nabe for the remedy to a 40-degree rainy day: a warm, authentic dinner comprising of Bistec a la Mexicana, una papa, arroz y frijoles con tortillas (Mexican –style steak served with rice, beans and a baked potato; also with tortillas, allowing the meal to be eaten like a fajita).







Uptown:

Uptown was another interesting nabe, for it obviously has 2 very conflicting and polar-opposite identities. Once the theater capital of Chcago, and a potential preeminent to the Loop, this nabe blossomed from 1920s development and investment, receiving many theater houses and (now) seemingly out of place skyscrapers.

I found Uptown to be stratified between the nicer, attractive gentrified areas near the Sheridan L stop (i.e Buena Park) and the grittier, run-down areas near Broadway and Wilson. Full of the homeless, abused, addicts and people of the aforementioned groups in various stages of recovery, alongside other marginalized groups, through the efforts of the local Ald (Shiller), the nabe is home to the highest unemployment, poverty, concentration of homeless shelters, number of sex offenders and violence in the Northside. Amongst other things it is also the home to the highest concentration of the chronically mentally ill (in the nation) – constituents the infamous alderman fights to keep there.

Several times, on Broadway/Wilson, I was accosted for money and solicited pornographic DVD’s. The neighborhood itself, the poorest & most dangerous on the Northside (only Rogers Park is higher) is one of Chicago’s most diverse, hosting a near-equal mix of Whites, Blacks, Asians and Hispanics, with an equally rich mix of socioeconomic groups. Locals differentiated the neighborhood from “gang-infested warzones” such Garfield Park, and said that Uptown was merely a good, livable nabe that so happened to have a high crime rate. Closer to the Argyle stop, one finds a large Vietnamese community, replete with the appropriate restaurants to compliment such. I have to admit, it was strange seeing a neighborhood with such amazing access to the lakefront and 24-hour Red Line, stellar architecture in a somewhat disappointing state.

Though, using the handful of theaters that’ve been renovated, the sprinkling of building renovations and new construction, the new-ish Borders and Starbucks and a visible youth presence, one could vouch that the nabe was in some stage of gentrification. In fact, several of the original establishments that helped build Wicker Park’s artist vibe have since relocated to Uptown, in the quest for cheaper rents and bigger spaces. Of particular interest to me was the abundance of stunning terra cotta architecture; the sheer detail and craftsmanship in these buildings was to be admired.







Lincoln Park:

Next stop was the archetypal Chicago yuppie neighborhood, Lincoln Park. I explored the areas surrounding the Armitage Brown Line stop, which with its near-continuous stretches of spectacularly-colored Victorians donning ornately-detailed corner turrets. The area was fascinating; it was dense, well-served by transit (Red/Brown lines) and had a handsome architectural integrity. The people seemed to be largely transient, with a majority being students at the nearby DePaul University. That said, while the Midwestern student body of DePaul often comes under scorn for various reasons, I’d much rather have them – frat boys, NCAA team-specific bars and Abercombie & Fitch withstanding – than the people who really drag down the quality of life. Lincoln Park actually reminded me more of Boston than it did Chicago; charming architecture of a ubiquitous style, college students and bars, tree-lined streets, intimate atmosphere, etc.




UK Village/E.Humboldt Park:

My favorite section of Chicago, though, had to be the areas on the periphery of Wicker Park: Ukrainian Village, E. Humboldt Park and Logan Square. As mentioned in my previous blog post, these areas appeal to me for they offer great proximity to the scenes in Wicker Park & Bucktown , but aren’t too far from major employment centers and transit arteries. More importantly, you have these wonderful conveniences, without the exorbitant prices (though, as a Californian, all of Chicago is relatively affordable) and without the hyper-development and gentrification that is found in the former neighborhoods. The lack of hype has kept these locales somewhat secluded and sheltered, giving them an almost quaint, intimate feel – an oasis within the city, if you will. What appealed to me the most, though, was that the neighborhood had a perfect mix. It had the gritty authenticity that I would expect from Chicago, but, too, it had trendy restaurants, bars (I love all of the old-school watering holes with Cyrillic signage) and boutiques reminiscent of home. The desirable balance and stellar locations would make these nabes my number 1 pick were I to move to Da Chi.






Metro Gold Line Opening

Monday, November 16, 2009

Yesterday, November 15th, Metro opened it newest rail line: The Gold Line Eastside extension, a 6-mile, 8-station light rail connecting Downtown to the predominately-Hispanic areas immediately east of it. The train, which runs at-grade along a dedicated right of way and an underground subway tunnel (the latter for 1/3rd of the trip), debuts as the first rail line in the transit-starved and -dependent region; and was met with appropriate fanfare: some 75,000+ people showed up for free rides, food and various festivities along the route. The rail successful opening comes on the heels of a Metro marketing blitz that included interactive websites, advertisements throughout the city and numerous community meetings designed to foment demand and awareness.

Around 1-oclock, I set out from the 7th/Metro Center to Union Station, where I anticipated a free ride from its westernmost terminus. However, though, that was all but impossible; lines snaked throughout the station and into adjoining parking lots outside of the facility itself. That having failed, I backtracked to my starting place and caught a ride to the Little Tokyo station, hoping the station would be absent of the ridiculous crowds, madness and frenzy found at Union Station. The Little Tokyo station itself was typical of the Metro light rail stations as of late; generally outdoors in nature, compact in footprint and minimalistic in detail, with a central theme incorporated into the design. Having succeeded in avoiding the chaos at US, I called a friend of mine, Eric, and told him to meet me there and to bypass Union Station altogether.

While I waited on the platform for Eric, I was recognized by several people who were familiar with my photography work on sites such as Flickr and Skyscraperpage. Being the congenial person I am, we all chatted about and discussed the euphoria and praised the expansion of LA’s fledgling mass transit system – while of course, urging for the continued expansion of it. And, while on this topic, I’ve got to admit, there is a certain coolness associated with being recognized by folks from the ‘net. Before we knew it, amidst all of the commotion, we were aboard an eastbound train, having decided upon Mariachi Plaza as our first destination.

The station, named for the oft-romanticized mariachi bands that have traditionally performed at the titular plaza, was jam-packed with a fairly large-sized street fair taking up most of 1st Street. The fair unsurprisingly was complete with a mariachi band, of who were crooning while hundreds of people visited the booths of the numerous food/craft vendors, community organizations and NGO’s in attendance. After that, I continued heading along 1st, and before I knew it, I had crossed the 5 Freeway and was within distance of the Soto St. stop, which was a handful of blocks away.

The Soto St. Station, with its pulsating egg and refreshing simplicity was my favorite and definitely a looker. Blue and white, the station’s clean lines gave it a suave minimalistic edge and aura. Cool subway stations aside, I was most attracted to the theme and its relation to the neighborhood; the colors were definitely a stretch for the nabe, but the theme, which stressed finding home and one’s self was fitting, given Boyle Heights is a major hub for Mexican immigration. (Despite being nearly 100% Hispanic today, Boyle Heights was once the home the largest Jewish population west of the Mississippi – boasting some 50,000 Jews and 100 houses of worship).

After hopping on and off trains all day, engaging in a good bit of conversating and picture-taking, I had gradually worked myself up an appetite; and now was time to eat. I went to the perennial King Taco, the granddaddy of Mexican food in the area, and a place celebrated by locals and foodies alike. I ordered the quesadillas de pollo, served with guacamole, and got a coke to drink. Quite tasty, as usual..no surprises here. As previously mentioned on this blog, Boyle Heights/ELA, alongside perhaps Highland Park and South Gate/Huntington Park nexus (don’t really visit the latter 2) are the crème of the crop when it comes to Mexican food in LA. The sheer number of good places, on a per capita basis, is unrivaled…though Boyle Heights *should* be that way given it is the heart of Mexican culture in the world’s 2nd largest Mexican city.

So, what do I think of the new Gold Line? Well, first and foremost, I support Metro’s efforts to expand mass transit and foster a more livable, human-friendly city and environment. That said, I feel as if some things could have been improved. Number one being that it really should have been the subway the area deserves – and was promised. As for the light rail itself? The at-grade and stopping at red lights both have got to go. (Though, these aren’t nearly as bad as the stations in the 210 median, lol!) My other concerns, namely the slowing down around Union Station and Indiana Street will hopefully only be mere teething issues and resolved at a later date. Still, though, I am excited for this opening represents one of the more tangible results of our rather new commitment to transit. Too, this is the coming of age, the unfolding of the “new” Los Angeles – right before my very eyes, to boot.














Chicago: Neighborhoods Pt.I

Sunday, November 15, 2009

..Elaborating on my previous post where I said that I felt Chicago’s best asset was its string of unique neighborhoods, I’m doing to go ahead and dedicate this post to my assessments of the various Chicago neighborhoods I visited. A city of neighborhoods, Chicago’s neighborhoods were usually comprised of a particular architecture style; either prairie-style wood-frame houses and bungalows, 3 + 1 flats/walkups, Victorian buildings replete with turrets, 1920s courtyard apartments and in some areas, old, brick (beaux arts, art deco, neo-classical and Chicago style) skyscrapers. They tended to have an adjacent retail strip or shopping corridor, and more often than not, were anchored by, and sometimes named after fairly large parks (Washington, Garfield, Humboldt, Grant, Douglas, Lincoln, Portage, and the various Lakefront parks). The nabes…..true Americana urbanity.

The Loop:

Undoubtedly the New York of the Midwest, it is the bustling heart of Chicago and altogether the world’s 2nd largest employment center (in terms of sheer number of jobs). The dense city center is vibrant, teeming with business professionals, commuters and tourists, overwhelming in scale, and with its gargantuan skyscrapers, intimidating – quite literally, too, since many of the buildings feature gargoyle gatekeepers, amongst other Gilded Age details. Visiting the Loop, one is constantly dwarfed by towering skyscrapers -- several which are 100+ stories – and the seemingly never-ending construction/public works projects. That, and the ubiquitous “L,” a nickname affectionately used to refer to the vast elevated rail system.

The train lines – all of them – begin in the downtown area and fan out from there, but not before running in loop, enclosed fashion, hence the “Loop” name. Synonymous with trains in the US, Chicago has a long history with the iron horses, spanning from the sprawling rail yards that distributed meats (slaughtered 18,000,000 heads of livestock in 1920; remember “Hog Butcher for the World?”), to having been an early pioneer of inner-city rail systems. Sadly, despite a complex history of innovation, I found much of the system to be dated, starting with the 1960s train carriages. The worst part, though, was how in some areas the system was literally falling apart. On several occasions, my train had to stop many times for workers to place a new tie or plank of wood on the track. That and sharing 1 rail with another rail line (Red/Brown lines), something which hampered speed and efficiency. Another thing that left me wondering was why some of the stations lacked proper covering, in a city known for inclement weather nonetheless? Criticisms aside, the trains were indeed good enough to get me around the city with relative ease.

Courtesy of the El, I traveled practically the whole city, and was able to taken in a wide scope and crossection of Chicago neighborhoods and their corresponding lifestyles. As a city of several million, its neighborhoods unsurprisingly span the whole spectrum, from the dangerous which ensure Chicago’s status as a murder city, to the safer, more down to earth ones I am about to describe. Now that my thoughts and opinions have crystallized to a certain degree, perhaps what I liked most about Chicago neighborhoods was the sense of intimacy, scale and personality they all held. The quiet, leafy streets lined with gorgeous greystones and corner, locals-only ‘watering holes.’ Out of all the nabes I visited, I naturally found myself drawn to the whole Wicker Park nexus, of which includes Wicker Park (obviously), Bucktown, Logan Square, the Ukrainian Village and East Humboldt Park -- places of which will be discussed in a later post.








Chicago: The Good & The Bad

Saturday, November 7, 2009

..First and foremost, I’d like to state that Chicago is a fine city – and I mean that by any stretch or definition of the word. It is in many ways, what I consider to be the story of America: the boom & bust models; strong perseverance, and city/regional identities; the large immigrant influence that transcends assimilation; the yearning for success and prosperity; a city of have and have-nots, along with the severe inequalities and segregation that ensue. Yup, (for the most part) that’s America.

Now that I’ve had some time to really think it over, I felt that this trip to Chicago – perhaps our All-American City –was somewhat of an introduction to the ‘real’ American cities. And while some of the reasons for me thinking this may be a tad bit superficial, and in and of themselves facets transferable to any city, I couldn’t resist the temptation to liken them (Chicago and the 'real' American cities, that is).

For one, the layout, design and build form of the city; particularly having a bustling centerpiece Downtown serve as the central locus. Oftentimes the neighborhood density begins to taper off as you leave Downtown and only wanes the further one is from it. Another facet is the weather; for one, as an Angelino, hailing from a place where cold weather is unheard of, cold weather is synonymous with the rest of the country. For what it’s worth, I should probably note that until this trip, never in my life had I been in a climate that was so bleak, unforgiving and cold; one day the rain poured non-stop, not letting up a single time during the day (proper). And of course, the fierce civic pride and vehement support for the celebrated sports teams and their icons; all of the above are things I so fondly associate with the (big) cities of the Midwest and East Coast, especially since strong sports culture doesn’t exist here. Chicagoans LOVE their Bears. My flight home, which was on a game day, had flight crew frequently updating the passengers on the score and the Bears’ performance. It was impossible to go anywhere and expect to not hear about them in one way or another. Too, Chicago is a city that has a wealth of vibrant, exciting neighborhoods that burst and teem with life.

These nabes were special to me for they had a wealth of diversity, stellar architecture and green spaces, as well as a myriad of dining and shopping options, but also a stellar (indie) social scene. Best of all, they were glossed over with a semi-gritty, unpretentious feel. Totally ace in my book. Another admirable quality about Chicago neighborhoods was that no matter how close they were (sometimes a mere mile apart or a few blocks over) to each other; each one was unique and had its own, different thing going on. From the hipsterfied, boutique-laden streets of Wicker Park, to the Uptown neighborhood and its troubled dual identifies, to the LA-esque, vibrant Mexican boomtown of Pilsen, to the college student and yuppie-infested hangouts on Armitage in Lincoln Park, all the way to the pseudo-industrial lofts of the West and South Loops, and back to the dangerous Southside; in short: no 2 nabes were the same. Not to dwell too much on that, though, as I have a post dedicated to the neighborhoods of Chicago coming up.

Sadly, the city is undoubtedly the most racially/socially stratified and polarized I’d ever been. This archaic reality is manifested in the city’s racially segregated “sides:” the North side for Whites; West for Hispanics; South for Blacks. In fact, Chicago is so segregated that demographers had to invent a special word for it: hyper-segregation. Hell, Martin Luther King, said the racism in the South had nothing on Chicago’s, instead labeling Chicago “the most racist city” he’d ever been to. While there, I saw very little integration and interaction between races – not even interracial dating -- which, apparently, is the norm there; but here, in Los Angeles, such is to be condemned. One North side dweller told me that he knows more about and visits Manhattan than he does the city’s Southside, something so ever adjacent to him.

That said, obviously the people were different, too. On average, they seem a lot more wholesome and genuine – something which is a definite plus. This hospitality extended to even the really well-dressed and attractive people – people who are, by and large, rude and arrogant here; instead I found them to be relatively down to earth. I’d vouch that there is definitely a certain small town-esque charm and simplicity about these people that is appealing. The stereotypical working-class, unionized, beer-on-Sunday-with-the game, church-going ethnic (i.e Irish, Polish, German, etc) Whites who consider themselves to have “morals” and “ethics” are pretty rare around these parts, but are definitely visible there. And for those wondering, no, it’s not a bad thing; it just comes off as rather noticeable to an outsider. And, of course, I’d be foolish to forget the number of blacks.

Coming in at 35% of the city’s population, Chicago's black population is certainly more visible than that of LA. It was like..I was in the majority for once. Not really, though, as I saw how the blacks there lived. Sadly, its black neighborhoods were home to some of the worst (stateside, that is) urban living conditions I’d ever seen. Characterized by urban blight, wholesale abandonment and high crime rates, I visited some of these ‘real’ neighborhoods: Englewood, Lawndale, Bronzeville, and Douglas Park. Additionally, I visited the the Obamas’ former stomping grounds of Hyde Park and Kenwood – themselves one of a handful of integrated neighborhoods there. Man, these nabes were the real deal…maybe a tad bit – actually, make that a whole lot – too real.

Driving through these Southside locales, I felt as if I was on a real-life tour of The Wire, complete with the characters to accompany such. Under the cover of the ominous Illinois night sky, these characters: groups of down jacket-clad, timberland boot-wearing men huddled on the stoops of plywood-covered, weather-sealed, abandoned buildings, did anything and everything– legal, illegal or otherwise – to “survive;” to make it in one of America’s most dangerous cities. Though, in all honesty, I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised; given blacks are a historically oppressed group that, for the most part, has yet to overcome the impact and legacy of centuries of oppression (like the Black poverty rate being x3 that of whites). And when large populations of Blacks are compressed into small areas, the problems that affect them on a national level will only be magnified.

And while the areas in mention weren’t anywhere nearly as bad as some of the places Detroit (or any similar Rust Belt city, for that matter) has to offer, they did have the urban prairie made famous by Detroit. An urban prairie is what develops after so many homes have been abandoned, demolished or otherwise neglected, that nature in essence “returns,” bringing with it wild flora, fauna and animals. Such rolling prairies, which can be blocks long, and are located in the dead of urban nabes, characterized many of the Southside areas I visited. Oh, and don’t go there on an empty stomach, either. We circled the place for miles, looking for a decent place to eat; only to settle on one of the 2 restaurants were open. Eventually, we settled for Ali Baba’s Steak and Lemonade (the other was JJ’s Fish and Shrimp), where I ordered the steak gyro and lemon pepper French fries…something, which thanks to the nearly indiscernible bullet-proof glass, almost didn’t happen. Unwanted solicitations in the early AM for our phone numbers from the shady Palestinian chefs are uh, kind of strange, too.

So, after all of that, you guys might be curious as to how I think Chicago stacks up compared to LA? While it is obviously a city, it seems decidedly un-cosmopolitan and provincial, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing; it’s refreshing to get away from a city where so many of the people are shallow, superficial, supposedly ‘learned,’ ‘cultured’ and ‘liberal.’ Truth be told, Chicago definitely takes the cake and has inherent advantages when it comes to several categories: affordability and several things vital to urban living: urbanity, density, architecture and mass transit.

Diversity, integration, weather, transparency and crime/safety are all categories LA has the upper hand in – IMO, anyways. Though, I suppose one could argue Chicago is a better choice for livability and quality of life, too..though, that is only if one is strictly going by affordability, as I would consider Chicago’s affordability to be offset due to unreal level of crime (500+ murders in ’08; 17 murders in the week I was there; 7 shootings on 10/27 alone), glaring social issues, painstakingly cold weather and rampant corruption. Still a great town, though. If the weather didn’t get so damn cold, I could easily see myself living somewhere on a secluded, leafy street in the Ukrainian Village, Logan Square or East Humboldt Park, riding my bike to Wicker Park on the plentiful bike lanes and extensive bike infrastructure, living in a intimately charming 3-flat and having my “own” neighborhood dining, drinking and lounging options, blah blah..all that good stuff.

In total, Chicago, despite sharing similarities to certain East Coast cities, I found it to have its own set of marked differences and unique qualities that are indeed romanticize-able. The former Midwestern industrial brawn and giant, I found it to be the perfect analog to the coastal metropolises; big-city environment, with Midwestern sensibility. A place where bygone cultural facets and relics – those that once defined the big, old-time American cites in the Midwest – still flourish. And sadly – for better or ill – a place where some things will probably never change. Despite growing diversity, largely in the form of Mexican immigrants, Chicago’s reputation as a place lacking integration will only continue to persist. Although the city can – and does – build as many ritzy skyscrapers and condos as it wishes to, huge swaths of the city are still plagued by urban blight, nihilism, poverty and senseless violence. Not that these are somehow unique to Chicago; in fact this trip was more of an eye-opener than anything – to the harsh realities sometimes found in our cities.

Chicago does Chicago. It does its own thing; it withers criticism and continues moving to it's own beat
and that’s something I’m able to find merit in, and more importantly, enjoy.











Part 1: Echo Park

Monday, October 26, 2009

...To accomplish this project, I plan on visiting several neighborhoods that are currently in differing stages of gentrification. And while several neighborhoods are currently in the throes of gentrification (or were, pre-recession), I’ve decided to begin with what is perhaps the current hot-spot of such neighborhoods: Echo Park

Echo Park, or EP as I like to call it, is without doubt LA’s quintessential (ongoing) gentrification case. The old-time bastion of Latino culture located NW of Downtown and home to the famous Dodger Stadium is prized for its authentic grittiness and street culture, gorgeous hillside vistas, charming cottages, central location as well as being home to one of the finer parks in the city. For these reasons, combined with the rising cost of real estate, it comes to little surprise that gentrification would continue its eastward march along Sunset.

As a neighborhood actively in the midst of redevelopment and major changes, it is one that is hotly-contested, with both sides staking out large claims of the barrio; north of Sunset, yuppie homeowners have snapped up and renovated cute Spanish adobes, while south of Sunset, hipsters pile in multifamily units with the existing Mexican population. And while the neighborhood is still overwhelmingly Hispanic, locals have already begun to view newcomers with mistrust and suspicion; cautious of their long-term plans for the neighborhood – for good reason, too.

Despite gentrification efforts having been hindered by the onset of the recession, Echo Park significantly gentrified – at least according to people in the area, who say more than 20% of the population now is white. Honestly, I have no clue as to what the current census counts are, and I’m hesitant to refer to old ones for the fact the census bureau is known for vastly under-counting urban areas. (That and the fact that neighborhoods heavy in immigrants (illegal or otherwise) by and large don’t take part in census counts). It is those immigrants, who, according to locals, are being chased out or wrongfully evicted from apartments by landlords in order make way for renovations and rent increases to appeal the new demographic. This change, while having been somewhat of a gradual process – albeit one that gains far more traction with the passing of each year – is quite surprising for a neighborhood, which until 8 years ago, was almost exclusively Hispanic.

Unlike some “up and coming” neighborhoods that, because of the frantic pace of gentrification, the neighborhood is neither it’s old – or new self, and instead plays an rather odd middle position. Chelsea, NY is an example of this; a neighborhood that is neither fully upscale and trendy, nor gritty and bohemian. Interestingly enough, despite its sense of transition, EP is true to its dual personalities, being both a ‘hip’ destination and proud Latino cultural center. It is these unique syntheses of old time Mexican culture and flavor, with that of the newer hipster arrivals’ that has propelled EP into the ranks of my favorite neighborhoods.

Its unique, sometimes uneasy existence between the new and old is manifested in various ways, with my favorite being the jarring contrasts and juxtaposition between their respective stores and hangouts. Overpriced clothing boutiques, swank coffee shops, eclectic niche stores, chic cafes, and of course, the ubiquitous trendy art galleries mesh with greasy taquerías, aromatic panaderías, tired laundromats and other, general stores. The result is the creation of a unique, one of a kind hybrid culture that has appealed to and drawn people from all walks of life.

Will the currently hamstrung gentrification efforts resume when the market picks up? Or will EP sour, reverting back to its original state? Whatever the outcome may be, I hope it remains a place where the sense of pride in the establishments, people and civic attitude keeping its great small town feel – and position as an oasis in this burgeoning city of 4,000,000.